What’s not

As of this evening (December 4th 2010)I could still get wikileaks here: http://wikileaks.nl/

There’s an interesting omission from the recent cache of diplomatic cables Wikileaks has distributed. The Nordic countries, all formerly Eastern Bloc countries, other than Russia itself, and all of the Balkans, including Greece. So basically a big black hole from Vienna to Moscow that extends from Africa to the Arctic Sea. It doesn’t seem credible that there were no cables from this area–it is filled with areas of strategic importance, and countries that have been in flux (e.g. Yugoslavia/Serbia/Montenegro).

This omission suggests some type of data segregation, and perhaps reflects an operational division as well. The other possibility (very remote) is that the data from say Sweden or Switzerland, contained unflattering information re Julian Assange or wikileaks and therefore they did the data segregation. I really don’t believe this, but, since I don’t have information, will not exclude that possibility. Or, there is the possibility that there’s some really juicy stuff in there, perhaps that is what the ‘Insurance’ file is–something really really juicy just to prevent any extreme actions by US gov’t, which would not want that data released. Who knows, that is all speculation.

Image showing cables leaked by embassy of origin.
Where is Eastern Europe? Where are the Balkans? Where are the Nordic Countries?
What’s not

Leading questions by a reporter from the Huffington Post

Breaking news from Cryptome, apparently wikileaks is now going to be accused of receiving $20,000,000 from China.  After the “rape” charge was shown to be false, is this really the best they can do?:

29 September 2010

The Huffington Post Spying Game

Cryptome was interviewed by telephone today by Keith Thomson, a reporter for The Huffington Post. After a bit of palaver Keith said a confidential source claimed a Chinese spy agency had given Wikileaks $20 million. What did Cryptome think about that?

We said that kind of money is usually given by spy agencies to publications like The Huffington Post rather than an offbeat like Wikileaks. Could be, though: according to reports Wikileaks has joined with major publications to provide the kind of information for which spies would pay $20 million.

Also, now that there are billions of dollars being distributed around the world by spy agencies for which $20 million is a small sum, it is possible that such a contribution could have been made to Wikileaks alone, if not to the illusory Wikileaks, then to an legitimate financial agent of the venture — of which Daniel Schmitt said there are several. This would fit claims by Julian Assange to have raised over a million dollars recently, and just yesterday Wikileaks Tweeted that money was no problem.

Keith said what would you do if someone sent Cryptome a million dollar donation, a check. We said we would publish the check as a sting operation. Nothing like that can be kept secret, the recipient might try to keep it secret but it will come out, usually by someone within the receiving group aggrieved at being short-changed.

Keith said this discussion is off the record. Cryptome said it does not do off the record interviews. We publish accounts of them.

Leading questions by a reporter from the Huffington Post